Ask us something
Technical questions go straight to the graders.
Reuse displaces manufacture. Recycling only displaces disposal.
Building a new 48 × 40 costs somewhere around 24 kg CO₂e cradle-to-yard, once you count harvest, milling, drying, fasteners and inbound freight. Recovering, repairing, re-grading and re-delivering an existing one costs us about 3.1 kg, and the dominant term in that figure is the truck. That difference — roughly 21 kg per platform — is the whole environmental case, and it is a real emission that did not happen.
Push the truck far enough and the case collapses. A long recovery run for a half-empty trailer is not a climate win however green the cargo is, which is why we obsess over backhaul matching and have deliberately not expanded the fleet radius. Density beats distance in this business, and a national pallet company is mostly a trucking company.
Landfill is the worst outcome for a different reason than most people assume. Buried wood decomposes anaerobically and releases methane rather than carbon dioxide, and methane traps far more heat over the twenty-year horizon that current commitments run on. That is the strongest argument our industry has and the one it makes least often.
- Diversion rate is a vanity metric. A yard can grind everything, report 100% diversion, and destroy thousands of repairable platforms.
- Ask for return-to-service percentage instead. Ours was 94.2% last year, with 5.8% to fiber, both from weighbridge tickets.
- Transport can eat the entire benefit. Ask how far your material travels to be recovered.
- Do not count the carbon stored in the wood as a credit — forestry accounts already claim it upstream.
- Methane, not carbon dioxide, is why landfilling wood is uniquely bad.
- Treating 'recyclable' as an environmental claim when it describes a material property, not an outcome
- Double counting sequestered carbon alongside avoided manufacture
- Publishing a precise single carbon figure built on allocation choices the reader cannot see
- Letting wood leave site in a mixed-waste container and calling it recycled
- Celebrating a diversion rate achieved by grinding repairable platforms
5 on ecology, newest first.
A pallet’s fourth life, measured
We followed one 48×40 through seven years, four lives and two counties. Here is what it carried, what we replaced, and what it saved.5 min · 1,111 words · Dale, repair lead
January 20, 2026The methane problem with landfilled wood
The same carbon atom does very different damage depending on which gas carries it out. This is the strongest environmental argument our industry has.5 min · 987 words · Priya, operations
June 24, 2025Diversion rate is a vanity metric
A yard can hit 100% landfill diversion while destroying thousands of repairable pallets. The number that can embarrass us is a different one.4 min · 820 words · Priya, operations
September 17, 2024Wood is a carbon store with a shelf life
A pallet is about twenty kilograms of sequestered carbon in temporary custody. How long it stays that way is the only part we control.4 min · 884 words · Priya, operations
January 30, 2024Why “recyclable” is the weakest claim on a packaging spec
Recyclable describes a theoretical possibility. Reused, recovered and diverted describe things that actually happened. The difference matters more every year.4 min · 826 words · Priya, operations
The tables behind these posts.
The same data we work from in the yard, so you can check the arguments above against the numbers.
| Document | When | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Certified weigh ticket | Every inbound and outbound movement | The evidentiary basis of any diversion claim |
| Count sheet by grade | Every purchase of your surplus | You get the sheet, not a summary |
| ISPM-15 batch record | Any heat-treated consignment | Turns a port query into an email |
| Pallet Passport record | Any remanufactured platform | Origin, repair history, treatment batch, running ledger |
| Quarterly diversion report | Programme customers | Measured tonnage for ESG reporting, not an industry average |
| Feedstock segregation attestation | Mulch and bedding buyers | Written statement of what the wood was |
| Certificate of insurance | On request | Named-insured endorsements for on-site crews |
| Grading criteria statement | On request | The written standard our graders work to |
Ask for any of these before an audit rather than during one. Assembling the pack takes us an afternoon and converts verbal questions into documents.
Relative demand pressure on the Mid-Atlantic recycled pool across a year, indexed to the October peak. Harvest, retail peak build and the construction push before winter overlap in roughly eight weeks. Hover or tap a month for what is happening in it.
The terms these posts assume you know.
Vocabulary is the cheapest performance upgrade in this industry — almost every argument we have with a new customer comes down to two people using the same word for different objects.
- Board foot
- A unit of lumber volume: 12 × 12 × 1 inches. A 48×40 GMA pallet contains roughly 35–40 board feet.
- Core
- An unsorted, un-repaired used pallet — raw material for a recycler. Sold by the load.
- KD
- Kiln dried — moisture reduced, usually to ≤19%, to prevent mould and dimensional movement.
- Whitewood
- Any non-pooled, non-rental pallet — owned outright rather than leased from a programme.
Where ecology meets what we actually sell.
Ecology questions we get.
What is the actual carbon saving from a recycled pallet?
Roughly 21 kg CO₂e per platform of avoided manufacture, on our own figures — 24 kg to build new against about 3.1 kg to recover and repair. We publish the method rather than a headline number because allocation choices can swing a published figure by a third, and anyone quoting you a precise single value is choosing assumptions you cannot inspect.
Why do you refuse to claim the carbon stored in the wood?
Because the forestry accounts upstream already record that sequestration when the tree grew. Claiming it again at the pallet stage is double counting, and it appears in published industry figures more often than it should. We claim avoided manufacture and avoided landfill methane, both of which are genuinely attributable to us.
Is mulch a good environmental outcome?
It is the least bad of the end-of-life options and it is still an end of life. Mulch decomposes aerobically over two to five years, so it delays rather than abolishes the release. It is dramatically better than landfill, where the same carbon leaves as methane, and dramatically worse than repairing the platform and using it again.
Eleven more areas.
NoteSubject pages are reachable from the blog index and from every post rather than the main menu. The full archive lists all forty posts by year.